Standards & scope discipline
How we decide what comes out and what stays
The single biggest driver of mitigation cost disputes is material removal. Our approach follows recognized
restoration industry standards for water damage restoration and applied structural drying, and the decision
tree is consistent:
Category drives salvageability
- Category 1: clean water from a sanitary source. Most materials are candidates for
in-place drying where readings support it.
- Category 2: significant contamination. Porous materials are evaluated individually
rather than removed by default.
- Category 3: grossly contaminated. Affected porous materials are removed, and that
removal is documented with the contamination rationale.
Readings drive duration
Equipment stays until affected materials reach the dry standard established from comparable unaffected
materials in the same structure, and comes out when they do. Extended drying days get a documented
reason, not an assumption.
What we will tell you plainly
If a loss does not need what someone else scoped, we will say so. If hidden moisture makes a loss larger
than it first appeared, we will document it before we expand scope, not after. Neither conversation is
comfortable, and both are cheaper than the alternative.
Emergency board-up on the same file
When a loss involves an open building, our
emergency board-up and roof tarping is documented on the same file with
the same standard, so emergency mitigation and drying reconcile together rather than arriving as two
unrelated invoices.